One fallacy that Wallace
uses during his speech is Scapegoating. When
he says, “It is a government that claims to us that it is bountiful as it buys
its power from us with the fruits of its rapaciousness of the wealth that free
men before it have produced and builds on crumbling credit without
responsibilities to the debtors, our children”, he is blaming the federal
government for taking the freedom away from the American people. Because he is
bashing on his opponent, this makes Wallace look weak. Although he is trying to
explain to the people that the federal government is the bad guy in the sense,
he is calling them names and putting them responsible for everything that is
going wrong in the world. By doing that and not backing himself up with facts,
this makes Wallace look unprofessional and unfair. This ties in to “DEMOCRACY, DEMAGOGUERY,
AND CRITICAL RHETORIC” by Roberts Miller and van
Eemeren and Grotendoorst’s basic assumption that argumentation is discourse
ori- ented toward resolving a dispute, and there certain rules inherent in such
behavior. The first rule is “Parties must not prevent each other from advancing
stand- points or casting doubt on standpoints”. Wallace engages in personal
attack by blaming the federal government, calling them names, and holding them
responsible for freedom being taken away from the American people. Thereby,
this is all fallacious, which makes Wallace’s speech weak.
No comments:
Post a Comment